MARJORIE R. SPRINGER, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN P. SPRINGER, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA STEEL CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND JOSEPH L. JEFFERSON, APPELLEES
MARJORIE R. SPRINGER, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN P. SPRINGER, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA STEEL CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND JOSEPH L. JEFFERSON, APPELLEES
133 So. 2d 78
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1961)
Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
We have read the testimony and the charges of the court in this case and do not find any reversible error committed by the trial court.
This case is, therefore, affirmed.
ALLEN, Acting Chief Judge, and KANNER and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Collura, 163 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)…in spirit, with the terms of the contract; or he should at least be held to reasonably strict compliance with the terms thereof. 6 Blashfield, Cyc. Auto. Law and Practice, Part II, § 4059, cited in Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Lingle, Fla.App.1961, 133 So. 2d 78. In the absence of waiver or es-toppel, failure to observe the requirements of the cooperation clause will justify the insurer, if it so elects, in treating the policy as broken at the time of the breach of said condition and will defeat recovery on…1 / 2
-
The AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Mills, 192 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)…ws, that defendant’s sworn statement was false and constituted a material breach of the cooperation clause which was prejudicial as a matter of law. In this [*61] regard plaintiff cites the case of Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Lingle, Fla.App. 1961, 133 So. 2d 78 wherein the second district held as a matter of law that the insurer should have been granted a summary judgment. In the Lingle case, the insured gave a written statement one month after an accident which contained the' information that the injured…
-
The AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Hasan Shihada, 196 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)…automobile collision and (2) the tort-feasor’s testimony at the trial. It is urged that the discrepancies between the two are such that the appellant was mislead and prejudiced in its defenses. See Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Lingle, Fla.App.1961, 133 So. 2d 78. [*15] In the Glens Falls case, the court held that a change of position by the insured after two years, whereby he initially maintained that the claimants were his employees and later at trial that they were not employees, was sufficient in the abs…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence