BERGH

v.

BERGH

Citator

Cited By

• Tampa-Hillsborough Cnty. Expressway Auth. v. K.E. Morris Alignment Serv., Inc., 444 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 1983)
  …erpretation or construction, it is axiomatic that courts should endeavor to avoid giving it an interpretation that will lead to an absurd result. State ex rel. Florida Industrial Commission v. Willis, 124 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), cert. denied, 133 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1961). If we were to adopt the district court’s view of section 73.071(3)(b), there could be absurd and unfair results in hypothetical situations that readily come to mind. Under the district court’s approach, two property owners operating busi…
• Sitomer v. Sitomer, 397 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …5 So. 2d 282, 285 (Fla.1954). There is a significant distinction, however, between a master’s findings of fact and his conclusions of law. The difference was discussed by the court in Bergh v. Bergh, 127 So. 2d 481, 486 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 133 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1961): We do not construe the rule in Harmon to mean that even though the conclusions of law reached by a special master upon the facts established by the evidence may find support in accepted equitable principles, that such conclusions are bi…
• Anderson v. Anderson, 736 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …and conclusions if they are clearly erroneous or if the Master has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence ‘presented. (Citations omitted) (emphasis supplied.) Id. at 1282. See also Bergh v. Bergh, 127 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 133 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1961). Based on the facts of this case, the trial court did not err. This case was before the trial court on the father’s supplemental petition for modification of the child custody order in the parties’ judgment of dissolution. After an exten…

Authorities Cited

• Bergh v. Bergh, 127 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)