STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
HOWARD ALAN MEYERS, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court upheld the disbarring of attorney Howard Alan Meyers, who pleaded guilty to seventeen felony charges including grand larceny, forgery, and uttering forged instruments. The Court affirmed the Board of Governors' disciplinary recommendation based on the finding that Meyers' criminal conduct violated rules requiring attorneys to act with honesty, justice, and good morals.
The Court affirmed the disbarring of Meyers, approving the Board of Governors' determination that his criminal conduct violated rules requiring attorneys to maintain honesty, justice, and good morals, and that disbarment was the appropriate sanction.
“as a lawyer, Respondent committed acts contrary to honesty, justice or good morals in the course of his relations as an attorney or otherwise.”
Establishes the disciplinary standard under Article XI and Rule 28 that Meyers violated
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHoward Alan Meyers, a member of The Florida Bar, pleaded guilty in the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County to seventeen separate criminal charges …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Uttering Forged Instruments cases and more on FLexlaw
On June 6, 1961 there was served upon the respondent, Howard Alan Meyers, a member of The Florida Bar, a complaint charging him with offenses warranting discipline under the provisions of Article XI of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A. Therein he was alleged to have been guilty of professional misconduct consisting of grand larceny, forgery of promissory notes, and uttering forged instruments, “all of which crimes or offenses constituted felonies under the laws of Florida.”
The complaint alleged respondent had plead guilty to such charges in the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County and was accordingly convicted upon seventeen separate criminal charges. Respondent' was therefore accused in the complaint of having violated Rule 28 of Additional Rules Governing the Conduct of Attorneys in Florida, 31 F.S.A., and the second paragraph of Article XI of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, supra, “in that as a lawyer, Respondent committed acts contrary to honesty, justice or good morals in the course of his relations as an attorney or otherwise.”
Respondent’s answer admitted the allegations of the complaint and waived notice of hearings thereon and of the right to be present or have counsel to represent him at such hearings,
Consequently, the hearing was held before a referee without the presence of respondent or counsel for respondent. The finding of the referee was that the respondent was guilty of professional misconduct as charged in the complaint. He found that the respondent was guilty of numerous acts and deeds involving and amounting to moral turpitude, which acts had occurred over a considerable period of time and formed a constant pattern, “the fruition of which amounts to absolute and total abandonment of the moral virtues.” The referee found that these deeds of misconduct occurred “while acting in his capacity and within the sphere of his law practice.”
It was the recommendation of the referee that the respondent be disbarred and forever enjoined from the practice of law in this state and that his name be stricken from the rolls of membership of The Florida Bar. He submitted his report to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar.
The board reviewed the referee’s report, approving and adopting his findings of fact and his disciplinary recommendation. The board adjudged the respondent to be guilty, of unprofessional conduct as charged and ordered that he be disbarred. This judgment and the record of the proceedings was filed with the Clerk of this Court on July 24, 1961.
More than 30 days having now elapsed since the filing with the Clerk of this Court *554of the judgment of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar, together with the record of the proceedings, and no petition for review of such judgment having been filed, and this Court having duly considered the record in said cause and said recommendations, it is thereupon ordered that the judgment of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar that the respondent, Howard Alan Meyers, be disbarred from the practice of law be approved, and said respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in this State.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.