DARNELL KENO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Habitual offender status properly applied to enhance sentencing where the defendant meets the statutory requirements of section 775.082(8)(a)(2).
[1] Habitual offender sentencing enhancement under Florida Statutes section 775.082(8)(a)(2) is properly applied when a defendant meets the statutory requirements for habitua…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDarnell Keno appealed from a circuit court decision regarding his sentencing in Sarasota County. The case involved the application of habitual offende…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge.
Darnell Keno, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 775.082(8)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. Baker, 874 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); O'Neal v. State, 862 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003);
Ellington v. State, 96 So. 3d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); State v. Garcia, 923 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); State v. Newmones, 765 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- O'Neal v. State, 862 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- State v. Newmones, 765 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
- Ellington v. State, 96 So. 3d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)