STATE
v.
JOHN P. SKINNER

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-07-23
No. 5D18-685
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The Office of Public Defender lacks authority to intervene in civil traffic infraction cases.


Headnotes

[1] The Office of Public Defender lacks statutory authority to intervene in civil traffic infraction cases.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The State of Florida sought a writ of quo warranto to challenge whether the Office of Public Defender had authority to intervene in civil traffic infr…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Quo Warranto cases and more on FLexlaw


Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, J.

The State of Florida appeals the circuit court’s order denying its petition for a writ of quo warranto, challenging the Office of Public Defender’s authority to intervene in civil traffic infraction cases. Based on our opinion in State v. Grate, No. 5D18-683 (Fla. 5th

DCA July 27, 2018), issued simultaneously herewith, we treat this matter as a direct appeal, reverse the circuit court’s order, and remand with instructions to grant the petition.1

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Footnotes
1 The circuit court considered this matter with a three-judge panel. Judge Paulk dissented and would have granted the petition.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw