IVAN MALDONADO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2018-07-25
No. 17-2661
250 So. 3d 125 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2018) Positive Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the trial court's denial of the Rule 3.850 motion based on the controlling precedent established in Hart v. State.


Headnotes

[1] A circuit court's denial of a Rule 3.850 post-conviction relief motion may be affirmed based on controlling precedent within the appellate district, with certification of…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Ivan Maldonado appealed the denial of his Rule 3.850 post-conviction relief motion in a criminal case from St. Lucie County.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hart v. State, ––– So. 3d –––, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D970a, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018) (en banc). As we did in Hart, we certify conflict with Cuevas v. State, 241 So. 3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Blount v. State, 238 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Mosier v. State, 235 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Alfaro v. State, 233 So. 3d 515, 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); and Burrows v. State, 219 So. 3d 910, 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. WARNER, J. concurring with opinion. WARNER, J. concurring.

Although I adhere to my dissent in Hart v. State, ––– So. 3d –––, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D970a, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018) (en banc), I recognize that Hart is now the law of this district until the certified question is answered by our supreme court.

2

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw