BRITANY LANE F/K/A BRITTANY HOYT
v.
CHARLES HOYT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-08-01
No. 18-2082
249 So. 3d 795 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A motion to disqualify a trial judge that raises sufficient grounds for disqualification may be denied as untimely where it fails to comply with applicable filing deadlines.


Headnotes

[1] A motion to disqualify a trial judge must comply with applicable filing deadlines under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(d)(1) & (e), and untimeliness bars r…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner Britany Lane sought a writ of prohibition challenging a trial judge in proceedings against Charles Hoyt. She filed a motion to disqualify t…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

August 1, 2018 PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

WETHERELL and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur; BILBREY, J., concurs with opinion.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

2

BILBREY, J., concurring.

The motion to disqualify the trial judge raised sufficient grounds for disqualification but was untimely. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d)(1) & (e). I therefore concur in the denial of the petition for writ of prohibition. Of course, the trial judge retains “authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge’s own initiative.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i).

_____________________________ David A. Carroll, Pensacola, for Petitioner. Caryn Van Matre, Pensacola, for Respondent.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw