ROHBANNI WILSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Graham v. Florida does not apply to offenders eighteen years of age or older.
[1] Graham v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRohbanni Wilson appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Duval County, raising an issue regarding the applicability of Graham v. Florida to his …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
August 7, 2018 PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Romero v. State, 105 So. 3d 550, 553-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), does not apply to offenders eighteen years of age or older).
WOLF, LEWIS, and RAY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lockhart v. State, 260 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
-
Marshall v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Graham v. Florida (1st Cir. 2010)
- Romero v. State, 105 So. 3d 550 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
- Octavius Walker v. State, 105 So. 3d 550 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)