JOSEPH R. DINSMORE AND LAKE YALE RESORT, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,

v.

O. O. WATFORD, B. J. OVERSTREET, DEAN WATFORD AND WATFORD, OVERSTREET & WATFORD, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Elmore Ivey v. Nat'l Fisheries, Inc., 215 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
  …aken or used without the employer’s permission. Johnson v. Mills, Fla.1948, 37 So. 2d 906; Pearson v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., Fla. App.1966, 187 So. 2d 343; Hankerson v. Wilcox, Fla.App.1965, 173 So. 2d 747; Hudson v. Smith, Fla.App.1961, 135 So. 2d 450. Unauthorized use of an auto has been held to include those situations wherein the employer’s permission to use the vehicle extended only to the immediate business premises and the tort occurred outside this boundary. Therefore, that fact served to…
• Powell v. Henry, 224 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
  …umption was rebuttable and “vanished” when uncontra-dicted evidence showed that the trailer did not in fact belong to him. The lower Court also so held, and we also agree. Aired v. Jones, Fla.App. 1966, 189 So. 2d 226; Hudson v. Smith, Fla.App.1962, 135 So. 2d 450; Leonetti v. Boone, Fla. 1954, 74 So. 2d 551; Johnson v. Mills, Fla.1948, 37 So. 2d 906. Adair indisputably, by deposition and otherwise, established that the Miller tandem axle trailer involved in the accident, although it bore a license tag which…
• Ruth S. Keller and her husband v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 156 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)
  …field crews during the daytime. His use of the truck on the evening of the accident was in violation of specific company rules and we can find no circumstances from which the consent of the Company can be implied. See Hudson v. Smith, Fla.App.1961, 135 So. 2d 450; Johnson v. Mills, Fla.1948, 37 So. 2d 906. The judgment appealed is affirmed.…