CLAUSEN
v.
CLAUSEN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Trial court erred in calculating alimony by failing to include imputed income for the former wife and failing to account for child-related expenses incurred by the former husband.
[1] In calculating alimony, a trial court must impute income to a former spouse when appropriate and must consider child-related expenses incurred by the other spouse.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe trial court entered a final judgment dissolving the marriage of Wayne Clausen and Susan Clausen. The former husband appealed and the former wife c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Wayne Clausen (the Former Husband) appeals the final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered by the trial court, and Susan Clausen (the Former Wife) cross-appeals. We affirm without discussion all issues raised in the appeal and all issues raised in the cross-appeal, except issues related to the alimony award. As to that award, we reverse and remand for further proceedings because the trial court erred in failing to include income imputed to the Former Wife in its calculations and erred in failing to consider the child-related expenses being incurred by the Former Husband.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
PALMER, ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.