PETRUS

v.

BUNNELL

Citator

Cited By

• Rodriguez v. Gonzalez, 157 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
  …959, 116 So. 2d 16; Russ v. State, 1939, 140 Fla. 217, 191 So. 296; Preston v. State, Fla.1952, 56 So. 2d 543; Florida Southern Ry. Co. v. Hirst, 1892, 30 Fla. 1, 11 So. 506, 16 L.R.A. 631; Sauer v. Sauer, Fla.App.1961, 128 So. 2d 761, cert. denied, 135 So. 2d 742. In the case of Carraway v. Revell, supra, the supreme court, speaking through the present Mr. Chief Justice Drew, gave a thorough and illuminating analysis which serves to clarify the concept of negligence as it has been divided in degrees or kind…
• HERTZ Corp. & William H. Brown v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 627 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
  …e negligent operation of it no matter where the driver goes, stops, or starts.” To the same extent as an owner, a bailee is likewise liable to third persons under the doctrine. As stated in Sauer v. Sauer, 128 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 135 So. 2d 742 (Fla.1961): It would therefore appear that the rule which is applicable to the instant case is not essentially based on respondeat superi- or nor on agency conceptions but on the practical fact that the bailee of a means of death and destruction sh…
• Fisel v. Wynns, 650 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
  …d enclosure without the intervention of a person to open the gate), and that the Wynns were liable for the conduct of this other person. This issue was present, but not addressed, in Gordon v. Sutherland, 131 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 135 So. 2d 742 (Fla.1961). The facts were very similar. Cows in the highway adjacent to Sutherland’s property caused an accident. Sutherland, admitting ownership, testified that he checked the gates and found them secure shortly before the accident. He found after…

Authorities Cited

• Petrus v. Bunnell, 129 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)