ISAAC J. HARVIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the case is remanded for correction of a scrivener's error in the Order of Revocation of Probation.
[1] A scrivener's error in a written order of revocation of probation may be corrected on remand where the trial court's oral pronouncement of guilt or acquittal on specific…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAt an evidentiary hearing on probation violations, the trial court orally pronounced Harvis guilty of violating Conditions 5 (new law violation), 3 (c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Order cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The Order of Revocation of Probation indicates the trial court found Appellant guilty of each of the alleged violations of probation. However, at the evidentiary hearing, the trial court orally pronounced Appellant was found guilty of willfully violating his probation by violating Condition 5, committing a new law violation, Condition 3, changing residence without permission, and Condition 15, failing to remain confined to his approved residence. The trial court found Appellant not- guilty of violating his probation for failing to pay cost of supervision, nor failing to complete community service. Thus, we affirm the convictions and sentences, but remand to the trial court for correction of the scrivener’s error. See Cook v. State, 947 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Craig v. State, 2018 WL 3040780 (Fla.
2
1st DCA June 2, 2018). Appellant’s presence at such correction is unnecessary.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and ROWE and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. State, 320 So. 3d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)
-
Berry v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2022)
-
Boyce v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)
Authorities Cited
- Branden J. Bailey v. State, 245 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
- Cook v. State, 947 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)