WILLIAM A. REGER, AGNES D. SNEDEKER, AND HOWARD T. WALTON, AS MEMBERS OF THE FLORIDA BOARD OF MASSAGE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANTS,
v.
BETTY LOUISE CHENEY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1962-01-08
No. 61-243
Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
136 So. 2d 247 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Board of Massage appealed a circuit court decision that quashed its revocation of Betty Louise Cheney's massage license. The court reversed, holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's license revocation based on findings of a nude woman and partially dressed man in the same room of the licensee's establishment.


Holding

The circuit court's finding is not supported because the record contains competent substantial evidence to support the Board's action in revoking the license. The presence of a nude woman and partially dressed man in the same room of the establishment constituted sufficient evidence for license revocation.


Key Quotes

“the evidence upon which the-board acted in revoking the certificate or- license of the petitioner as a masseuse is wholly insufficient upon which it could lawfully act”

The circuit court's finding that was being reviewed on appeal; the appellate court held this finding was not supported by the record.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Betty Louise Cheney held a massage license from the Florida Board of Massage. An investigation of her business premises led to charges and a hearing u…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Florida Board of Massage, appeals from the judgment of the circuit court granting writ of certiorari and quashing an order of the board. The appellee, Betty Louise Cheney, was a licensee of the board. An investigation of the premises upon which the licensee conducted her business resulted in charges and a hearing pursuant to Section 480.11, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The board then entered its order revoking her license. Thereafter the licensee brought her petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court.

This appeal from the judgment quashing the order of the board is brought to review the initial, judicial action which was the proceeding on the petition in the circuit court. See Wexler v. Ring, Fla.App.1961, 125 So.2d 883. We deem the question presented to be whether the finding of the circuit court that: “ * * * the evidence upon which the-board acted in revoking the certificate or- license of the petitioner as a masseuse is wholly insufficient upon which it could lawfully act”, is supported by the record of the proceedings before the board. We hold that the finding of the circuit judge is not supported because the record contains competent substantial evidence to support the action of the administrative body.

No useful purpose would be served by detailing the evidence. It is sufficient to say that the inspector found a nude woman and a partially dressed man occupying the same room of the licensee’s establishment.

The judgment of the circuit court quashing the order revoking appellee’s license is reversed and the cause remanded for the entry of an order dismissing the petition for certiorari.

Reversed.

CARROLL, J., dissents.

CARROLL, Judge

(dissenting).

On examining this record, I am in agreement with the trial judge’s conclusion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the particular charges on which the board acted. I, therefore, respectfully dissent from the majority judgment of reversal.

Dissent
CARROLL, Judge

CARROLL, Judge

(dissenting).

On examining this record, I am in agreement with the trial judge’s conclusion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the particular charges on which the board acted. I, therefore, respectfully dissent from the majority judgment of reversal.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Miami v. Cuban Vill-Age Co., Inc., 143 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
    …A temporary injunction was issued restraining the City from interfering with the appellee’s business until further order of the court, which injunction was approved by this court. See: City of Miami et al. v. Cuban Vill-Age Co., Inc., Fla.App. 1962, 136 So. 2d 247. Subsequently, the matter came on for final hearing and the chancellor entered a final decree granting to the appellee affirmative relief and directing the City to issue to it certain municipal licenses. Thereafter, the City took an appeal which, pu…
  • City OF Miami v. Cuban Vill-Age Co., Inc., 147 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
    …BARKDULL, Judge. This is the third appearance of this case in this court. On the first wc affirmed the [*327] granting of the temporary injunction in this matter. See: City of Miami et al. v. Cuban Vill-Age Co., Fla.App.1962, 136 So. 2d 247. On the second we granted a constitutional stay continuing the injunction in force, pending this review. See: City of Miami v. Cuban Vill-Age Co., Fla. App.1962, 143 So. 2d 69. This appeal now brings for review the final decree which made permanent…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw