STEVEN D. MACK
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's determination.
Steven D. Mack appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The specific substantive facts are not detailed in this per curiam …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Nick Nazaretian and Barbara Twine Thomas, Judges. Steven D. Mack, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Matthews, 891 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2004); Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Rankin v. State, 174 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); Shivers v. State, 96 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Cooper v. State, 902 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Robinson v. State, 642 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
- State v. Matthews, 891 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2004)
- Rankin v. State, 174 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
- Reyes v. State, 642 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- Alphonso Shivers v. State, 96 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)