PIRIE
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When a postconviction relief motion is facially insufficient, the trial court must grant the defendant at least one opportunity to amend rather than summarily denying the motion.
[1] When a postconviction relief motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is facially insufficient and timely filed, the trial court must enter a nonfinal, nonap…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“If the motion is insufficient on its face, and the motion is timely filed under this rule, the court shall enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing the defendant 60 days to amend the motion.”
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(f)(2), requiring amendment opportunity for facially deficient postconviction motions
Matthew Pirie filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. The trial court summarily denied the motion as facial…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Facial Insufficiency Of Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Matthew Pirie appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. While the court properly determined that Pirie’s motion was facially insufficient, it should have given him at least one opportunity to amend. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2) (“If the motion is insufficient on its face, and the motion is timely filed under this rule, the court shall enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing the defendant 60 days to amend the motion.”); Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754, 761-62 (Fla. 2007) (holding that trial court must give defendant one opportunity to amend facially deficient claims).
Accordingly, we reverse the summary denial and remand with directions that the court strike Pirie’s motion and grant him sixty days to file an amended motion if he can do so in good faith.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ORFINGER, EVANDER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.