DE LA CRUZ
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant arrested on different dates for different offenses is not entitled to have jail credit applied equally to all concurrent prison sentences.
[1] Jail credit need not be applied equally to all concurrent sentences when the defendant was arrested on different dates for different offenses.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A defendant who is arrested for different offenses on different dates is not entitled to have jail credit applied equally to all prison sentences even though the sentences are run concurrently.”
Court cited Nieves v. State, 113 So. 3d 162, 163 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), quoting Washington v. State, 873 So. 2d 609, 610 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
De La Cruz was arrested on different dates for multiple offenses and received concurrent sentences. The defendant sought to apply jail credit equally …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Concurrent Sentences cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a)(2); Jones v. State, 198 So. 3d 920, 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Mills v. State, 23 So. 3d 186, 187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); see also Nieves v. State, 113 So. 3d 162, 163 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (“[A] defendant who is arrested for different offenses on different dates is not entitled to have jail credit applied equally to all prison sentences even though the sentences are run concurrently.” (quoting Washington v. State, 873 So. 2d 609, 610 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004))).
COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Mills v. State, 23 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
- Washington v. State, 873 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
- Jones v. State, 198 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
- Nieves v. State, 113 So. 3d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)