LAWRENCE E. BRILES
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's sentencing decision under Florida's habitual offender statutes was affirmed without substantive opinion.
Lawrence E. Briles appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The appeal involved issues related to habitual offender sentenc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review Of Lower Court Decisions cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sabella, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See §§ 775.082(9)(a)(3)(c), 775.084(4)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (2011);
State v. Matthews, 891 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2004); Robinson v. State, 793 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 2001); Calloway v. State, 914 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Tillman v. State, 900 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Dinkens v. State, 976 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008);
Luton v. State, 934 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Matthews, 891 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2004)
- Warnell Robinson v. State, 793 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 2001)
- Calloway v. State, 914 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
- Luton v. State, 934 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- Enoch Eugene Dinkens v. State, 976 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)