TRUJILLO
v.
STATE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-10-19
No. Case No. 5D18-2333
255 So. 3d 532 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court abuses its discretion by summarily denying a postconviction relief motion on the basis of facial insufficiency without affording the appellant the opportunity to amend the pleading when the deficiency is correctable.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court must afford an appellant an opportunity to amend a facially insufficient postconviction relief motion before summarily denying it, when the pleading deficie…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Because [appellant] had not previously sought or been given leave to amend his rule 3.850 motion, and because the pleading deficiency in his motion is likely correctable, he should be given the chance to do so.”

Court citing Taylor v. State in support of the reversal regarding Ground 1

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel (Ground 1), but…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court's summary denial of Ground 1 of Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 Motion for Postconviction Relief because Appellant should have been afforded the opportunity to amend his facially insufficient claim. See *533Taylor v. State , 248 So. 3d 280, 281 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) ("Because [appellant] had not previously sought or been given leave to amend his rule 3.850 motion, and because the pleading deficiency in his motion is likely correctable, he should be given the chance to do so.") The trial court's order is otherwise affirmed.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw