WIENDL
v.
WIENDL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A former wife may recover appellate attorney's fees in a family law matter if she establishes entitlement pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes, and the standard set forth in Rosen v. Rosen.
[1] In family law proceedings, a party seeking appellate attorney's fees must establish entitlement pursuant to Florida Statutes section 61.16 and the standard articulated in Rosen v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA former husband petitioned for a writ of prohibition in a family law dispute. The former wife moved for appellate attorney's fees.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The former husband's petition for writ of prohibition is denied. The former wife's motion for appellate attorney's fees is remanded to the trial court. If the former wife establishes her entitlement pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes (2007), and Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997), the trial court is authorized to award her all or a portion of the reasonable appellate attorney's fees. See Rados v. Rados, 791 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA2001).
LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997)
- Rados v. Rados, 791 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)