THOMAS CHRISTOPHER CREWS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant who fails to object at sentencing or file a motion to correct illegal sentence under rule 3.800(b) cannot challenge an illegal VCC sentence on direct appeal, but may raise the claim post-mandate through a rule 3.800(a) motion or a rule 9.141(d) petition.
[1] A defendant who fails to preserve a claim of illegal sentencing at the trial level by objecting at sentencing or filing a motion to correct under Florida Rule of Criminal…
[2] Grand theft does not qualify as a primary felony offense eligible for violent career criminal sentencing enhancement under Florida Statutes § 775.084(1)(d)(3), (4)(d)(3).
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“he failed to preserve it for review by either objecting at the sentencing hearing or by moving to correct it pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)”
Court's explanation for why it could not address the merits of Crews's illegal sentence argument on direct appeal
Crews was convicted by jury of burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. He was sentenced as a violent career criminal to thirty concurrent years on bot…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Violent Career Criminal (Vcc) Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
THOMAS CHRISTOPHER CREWS, ) DOC #069873, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-484 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed October 24, 2018.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Lauren L. Brodie, Judge.
Spencer Cordell of Law Office of Spencer Cordell, Ft. Myers, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge.
A jury found Thomas Christopher Crews guilty of burglary of a dwelling (count one), see § 810.02(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013), and grand theft (count two), see §
812.014(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). Having reviewed the record in light of the arguments raised in the briefs and at oral argument, we affirm Crews's convictions without comment.
The trial court sentenced Crews as a violent career criminal (VCC) to concurrent terms of thirty years' imprisonment. Crews argues—and the State concedes—that his thirty-year sentence on count two is illegal because grand theft is not a "primary felony offense" eligible for VCC sentencing under section 775.084(1)(d)(3),
(4)(d)(3), Florida Statutes (2013). See Simmons v. State, 205 So. 3d 793, 794 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2016) (stating that VCC sentence for criminal mischief, which had been imposed to run concurrently with VCC sentence for burglary of an occupied dwelling, was illegal because criminal mischief was not a qualifying offense); Ubilla v. State, 8 So. 3d 1200,
1202-03 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (reversing the defendant's VCC sentence on theft count because theft does not qualify as a predicate offense or primary offense for VCC purposes). Nevertheless, we do not address the merits of Crews's argument because he failed to preserve it for review by either objecting at the sentencing hearing or by moving to correct it pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See
Filppula v. State, 133 So. 3d 1232, 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (declining to consider the defendant's challenge to his illegal sentence on direct appeal because the defendant failed to preserve the challenge via motion under rule 3.800(b)).
Accordingly, we affirm Crews's sentence on count one and affirm his sentence on count two without prejudice for Crews, after issuance of the mandate in this appeal, to either file in the trial court a motion to correct illegal sentence on count two pursuant to rule 3.800(a), see, e.g., Cribbs v. State, 978 So. 2d 828, 828-29 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2008) (reversing denial of rule 3.800(a) motion and remanding for resentencing without VCC enhancement), or file in this court a timely petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure
9.141(d), see, e.g., Simmons, 205 So. 3d at 794 (granting rule 9.141(d) petition and remanding for resentencing without VCC enhancement).
Affirmed.
KELLY and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ubilla v. State, 8 So. 3d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
- Cribbs v. State, 978 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
- Kiefer Filppula v. State, 133 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
- Simmons v. State, 205 So. 3d 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)