MAY
v.
NOVOA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An order is properly affirmed summarily when the appellant's initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal.
[1] Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), an appellate court may summarily affirm a lower court order when the appellant's initial brief fails to demonstrate a…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceVictor May appealed from an order entered in the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. The appellant raised issues in his initial brief, but failed to …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). See Soro v. Soro, 145 So. 3d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); Fla. Detroit Diesel v. Nathai, 28 So. 3d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“We conclude that the appellants' initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.”).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Detroit Diesel & Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc. v. Yaadram Nathai, 28 So. 3d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
- Roden v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 145 So. 3d 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
- Soro v. Soro, 145 So. 3d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)