CONFEDERATION LIFE ASSOCIATION, A CANADIAN CORPORATION, A/K/A LA CONFEDERACION DEL CANADA, APPELLANT,

v.

PORFIRIO PENDAS GARRA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Hunt v. State, 200 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
  …ip should be sufficient enough to (1) establish that the property was not that of the accused, Pippin v. State, 102 Fla. 1124, 136 So. 883 (1931); (2) protect the accused against a second prosecution for the same crime, Gagne v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So. 2d 90, and (3) to avoid misleading or embarrassing the accused in the preparation of his defense. Addison v. State, 95 Fla. 737, 116 So. 629 (1928). The facts of this case do not support appellant’s contention that the proof was insufficient to establish…
• Adirim v. State, 350 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …: (1) to prove that the premises allegedly broken into were not the property of the accused, and (2) to identify the offense sufficiently to protect the accused from repeated prosecution for the same offense. Addison v. State, supra; Gagne v. State, 138 So. 2d 90 (Fla.2d DCA 1962). These purposes have been met on the facts of this case. Appellant also asserts that reversible error was committed in denying his motion for acquittal on Count VI in that the state failed properly to allege ownership of the prope…
• I. v. Anderson, 356 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …ership rights therein. Potter v. State, 91 Fla. 938, 109 So. 91 (1926); Presley v. State, 61 Fla. 46, 54 So. 367 (1911); Vasquez v. State, 350 So. 2d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Jackson v. State, 259 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972); Gagne v. State, 138 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); Holzapfel v. State, 120 So. 2d 195, 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960). One of the essential elements of the crime of burglary relevant here is that the burglarized structure or conveyance must be that of another; that is, it must be lawful…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Confederation OF Canada Life Ins. Co. v. Arminan, 135 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)