DOMINIC NATHANIEL DAVIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Dominic Davis appealed his conviction and sentence for felony battery with a weapon. The court affirmed the conviction despite a defect in the jury instructions, but reversed and remanded the portion of the sentence imposing a $300 public defender fee, finding the trial court lacked statutory authority to impose a fee exceeding the $100 statutory minimum without proper findings and procedures.
The court reversed the $300 public defender fee, holding that any fee exceeding the $100 statutory minimum requires: (1) sufficient proof of higher fees or costs actually incurred; (2) factual findings by the trial court supporting the increased amount; and (3) oral pronouncement at sentencing with notice and opportunity for the defendant to be heard. The case was remanded for the trial court to either impose the statutory $100 fee or conduct proper proceedings if higher fees are justified.
[1] Public defender fees exceeding the statutory minimum require proof of higher costs incurred, express factual findings by the trial court regarding such costs, and oral pr…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[T]he imposition of a public defender fee that exceeds the statutory minimum can only occur 'upon a showing of sufficient proof of higher fees or costs incurred.'”
Court explaining the legal standard for imposing public defender fees above the statutory minimum.
Davis was convicted of felony battery with a weapon and sentenced to twenty years in prison with a $400 public defender fee imposed. After Davis moved…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Jury Instructions cases and more on FLexlaw
Dominic Davis appeals his conviction and sentence for felony battery with a weapon. Davis argues the written jury instructions were defective for failing to include “and” between the two numbered elements constituting felony battery. We affirm that issue without comment. However, Davis also appeals the amended portion of his sentence imposing a public defender fee in excess of $100, which the State correctly concedes was improper. We agree, and reverse and remand on that point.
The trial court sentenced Davis to twenty years in prison and imposed a $400 public defender fee.1 Davis moved to correct the public defender fee amount under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), and asked the trial court to strike the $400 fee and impose the $100 fee required under section 938.29(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2018), or hold a 1 Davis does not dispute the $50 public defender application fee. § 938.29(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018).
hearing to determine the proper fee amount. The trial court granted Davis’s motion, struck the $400 fee, and imposed a $300 fee. On appeal, Davis asks this court to require the trial court to strike the public defender fee, and either impose the $100 fee or hold a hearing. We agree.
“[T]he imposition of a public defender fee that exceeds the statutory minimum can only occur ‘upon a showing of sufficient proof of higher fees or costs incurred.’” Alexis v. State, 211 So. 3d 81, 82 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (quoting § 938.29(1)(a)). From this evidence, the trial court is required to make factual findings that such higher fees or costs were actually incurred. See id. at 82-83. Additionally, when a trial court exercises its discretion to impose a public defender fee exceeding the statutory minimum, the fee “must be orally pronounced at sentencing because such costs may not be imposed without affording the defendant notice and an opportunity to be heard.” Id. at 83 (quoting Mills v. State, 177 So. 3d 984, 985 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)).
Accordingly, we reverse the amended public defender fee in the amount of $300 because the trial court failed to make any factual findings as to the fee amount. Moreover, the trial court failed to provide Davis with notice or an opportunity to contest the amount. We remand to correct those errors. See id.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. GERBER, C.J., LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
N.j.p v. State, 308 So. 3d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
-
Brinson v. State, 302 So. 3d 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)
-
N.J.P. v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mills v. State, 177 So. 3d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
- Geraldo Alexis v. State, 211 So. 3d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)