DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIONAL TRUST CO., AS TRUSTEE
v.
WILLIAM F. NOLL

Fla. 2d DCA | 2018-10-31
No. 17-2848
Moore
260 So. 3d 361 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Once an underlying judgment is reversed on appeal, the non-prevailing party cannot receive attorney's fees awarded based on that judgment.


Headnotes

[1] An award of attorney's fees predicated on a final judgment must be reversed when that underlying judgment is reversed or vacated on appeal, because the party is no longer…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Once a final judgment is reversed and remanded by an appellate court, there can be no prevailing party for purposes of an award of prevailing party attorney's fees.”

Court citing Marty v. Bainter for the principle governing reversal of fee awards

Facts & Procedural History

Deutsche Bank sued to foreclose on a mortgage held by William F. Noll, III. The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing Deutsche Bank's forecl…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

ATKINSON, Judge.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company ("Deutsche Bank") appeals the final judgment awarding William F. Noll, III, the attorney's fees and costs that he incurred as a prevailing party after he obtained a final summary judgment dismissing

Deutsche Bank's foreclosure case. Deutsche Bank successfully appealed that underlying judgment in case number 2D16-5635. As such, because Mr. Noll is no longer the prevailing party and no longer entitled to an award of fees and costs on that basis, we must reverse. See US Bank Nat'l Ass'n for CSFB Heat 2006-7 v. Tranumn,

234 So. 3d 871, 872 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (citing Marty v. Bainter, 727 So. 2d 1124,

1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) ("Once a final judgment is reversed and remanded by an appellate court, there can be no prevailing party for purposes of an award of prevailing party attorney's fees. Consequently, an award of attorney's fees and costs predicated on a reversed or vacated final judgment also must be reversed.")).

Reversed and remanded.

SILBERMAN and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw