S. J. D.
v.
M. E. L.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for writ of certiorari was denied.
This is an original jurisdiction proceeding between S. J. D. and M. E. L. The specific factual circumstances are not detailed in this per curiam denia…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
October 31, 2018 PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Simmonds v. Perkins, 247 So. 3d 397 (Fla. 2018). LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
2
Joseph Alan Alvarez and Katherine B. Johnson of Zisser Law, PLLC, Jacksonville; and Michael M. Giel of Giel Family Law, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. Boris Galustov, David P. Grigaltchik, and Adam Rowe of Grigaltchik & Galustov, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.