ANNA H. LAUBACH
v.
W. F. NEHRLING, ET AL.

Fla. | 1934-11-03
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
117 Fla. 169 Florida Supreme Court (1934) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 157 So. 925
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Roscoe T. Anthony, Jr. v. Douglas, 201 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
    …y should believe a witness has testified falsely as to any material matter, to disregard his entire testimony. This form has been rejected in Florida. City of Coral Gables v. Blount, 1934, 116 Fla. 356, 156 So. 244 aff’d on reh., 1934, 116 Fla. 361, 157 So. 925) (cert. denied Twin Coach Corp. v. Blount, 1935, 294 U.S. 721, 55 S.Ct. 548, 79 L.Ed. 1253). It never has been in general use and presently is used only in Georgia where it is preserved by statute. 4 A.L.R. 2d 1083. The more common form of “falsus…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw