WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION

v.

CAROL FLORIDA CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• Crigger v. Fla. Power Corp., 436 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
  …reduced the period of limitations as to adverse possession to 7 years but left at 20 years the period for adverse user and the acquisition of easements by prescription. Florida Power Corp. v. McNeely, 125 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960), cert. denied, 138 So. 2d 341 (Fla.1961). . Downing v. Bird. See also Deseret Ranches of Florida, Inc. v. Bowman, 340 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) where it is stated, “Appellant argues that because there is no mention of the width of the easement in the complaint, the compla…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hollywood Lakes Section Civic Ass'n, Inc. v. City OF Hollywood, 676 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …l judgments or decrees. Nor is it a device for collateral attack upon them.” deMarigny v. deMarigny, 43 So. 2d 442, 445 (Fla.1949); see also §§ 86.011, 86.021, Fla. Stat. (1995); City of Miami v. Eldredge, 126 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 138 So. 2d 341 (Fla.1961). In City of North Miami Beach v. Bernay, 117 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960), the plaintiff brought an action on behalf of all residents of a certain area challenging the validity of two prior decrees which annexed the area in question int…
• Hensel v. Aurilio, 417 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
  …nor supported by the evidence. Such an easement has a gestation period of twenty years, clearly not approached by the time frames established by the evidence here. Florida Power Corporation v. McNeely, 125 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960), cert. den., 138 So. 2d 341 (Fla.1961). There is similarly no basis for imposing an easement of necessity. The record discloses that at the time of conveyance of lot B to appellant title to both lots C and D was in appellee and ingress and egress was available in the form of…

Authorities Cited

• Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Carol Fla. Corp., 122 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)