GRANT
v.
STATE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2018-11-16
No. 18-2283
Trott, Tashima, Callahan
257 So. 3d 1223 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2018) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A bench warrant must be quashed where the defendant was not given sufficiently clear notice that personal appearance would be required in court, even though he had executed a written waiver of appearance.


Headnotes

[1] When a bench warrant has already been issued, a writ of habeas corpus is the proper remedy to challenge the warrant based on insufficient notice of required personal appe…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the defendant was not given a sufficiently clear notice that her personal appearance would be required in court, notwithstanding that she had executed a written waiver of appearance”

The court applied the principle from Cruz v. State, 822 So. 2d 595, 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) to the facts of this case.

Facts & Procedural History

Aljamar Grant, a criminal defendant, executed a written waiver of appearance but contends he received insufficient notice that his personal appearance…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Aljamar Grant, the Defendant in a criminal case, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus to quash a bench warrant for his arrest. Based upon the State’s commendable confession of error, we grant the petition and quash the bench warrant immediately, notwithstanding the filing of any post-opinion motions. Cruz v. State, 822 So. 2d 595, 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“[W]e conclude that the defendant was not given a sufficiently clear notice that her personal appearance would be required in court, notwithstanding that she had executed a written waiver of appearance.”).

Where no bench warrant has been issued, but the trial court refused to undertake the ministerial act of accepting the defendant’s waiver of presence, the proper remedy is a writ of mandamus, but here, where the bench warrant has already issued, the proper remedy is a writ of habeas corpus. Id. at 596 & n.2 (citations omitted).

Petition granted.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw