M.G.
v.
STATE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2018-12-05
No. 3D18-1531
Cowart, Orfinger, Sharp
259 So. 3d 309 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

L.W. Adams, Jr., a minority stockholder, was sued individually for a mobile home sale transaction conducted by his corporation. A default judgment was entered against Adams personally after he failed to file an answer, which he delegated to the majority stockholder. The court reversed, finding the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to vacate the default where both a legal excuse and meritorious defense existed.


Holding

The trial court abused its discretion in refusing to vacate the default. The default must be vacated because Adams established both a legal excuse for failing to comply with civil procedure rules and a meritorious defense—that the suit should have been brought against the corporation, not against Adams individually.


Headnotes

[1] A default judgment may be vacated when the defendant demonstrates both a legal excuse for failing to comply with procedural rules and the existence of a meritorious defen…

[2] A trial court abuses its discretion by refusing to vacate a default judgment when the facts establish a legal excuse for noncompliance and a meritorious defense.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the trial court abused its discretion in not vacating the default entered against Adams individually. The facts established both a legal excuse for failing to comply with the rules of civil procedure and the existence of a meritorious defense.”

Establishes the two-part test for vacating defaults: legal excuse and meritorious defense.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Adams owned stock in L.W.A., Inc., d/b/a All American Mobile Home Sales, with James Graham as majority stockholder and active manager. Appellees sued …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, L.W. Adams, Jr., individually, owned stock in a corporation named L.W.A., Inc., d/b/a All American Mobile Home Sales. The majority stockholder, James Graham, as president and active manager, operates the corporate business. Appellees filed an action against the mobile home manufacturer and appellant “L.W. Adams, Jr., individually d/b/a All American Mobile Home Sales of St. Augustine” relating to their purchase of a mobile home from the corporate business. Adams, who had nothing to do with the sale of the mobile home from the corporate business to appellees and had sold his stock in the corporation before the action was filed, delivered the complaint and summons to Graham. Graham assured Adams that he would “take care of it,” but misplaced the documents and did not cause an answer to be filed in appellee’s action. A default was entered against Adams, individually. Adams received a copy of a court order setting the matter for jury trial solely on the issue of damages, and personally appeared at the hearing and tried to explain that the action involved the corporation and not himself personally. Judgment for $48,-631 plus costs was entered against Adams individually. Adams then moved to set aside the default and judgment, tendering the defense that the action should have been brought against the corporation and not himself personally. The trial court denied the motion and Adams appeals. We reverse.

*675Under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in not vacating the default entered against Adams individually. The facts established both a legal excuse for failing to comply with the rules of civil procedure and the existence of a meritorious defense. See Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. Bowman, 480 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). If there is any reasonable doubt, the default should be vacated to allow a trial on the merits. See B/G Amusements, Inc. v. Mystery Fun House, Inc., 381 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

The default is vacated, and the final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw