ROBERTS
v.
STATE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2018-12-05
No. 4D17-3877
Booth, Joanos, Miner
14 Fla. L. Weekly 1170 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2018)
Also reported at: 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2606 · 1989 WL 49612 · 268 So. 3d 147

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida reversed a conviction for attempted second-degree murder, finding that the trial court committed fundamental error by failing to instruct the jury on the necessarily included offense of attempted manslaughter by act. The court granted the state's concession of error.


Holding

Yes, the trial court committed fundamental error by failing to instruct the jury on the necessarily included offense of attempted manslaughter by act. This error requires reversal of the conviction.


Headnotes

[1] A jury instruction for manslaughter that requires proof of an intent to kill, rather than an intent to commit the act that caused death, constitutes fundamental error.

[2] Failure to instruct the jury on a lesser included offense that is one step removed from the charged offense constitutes reversible error per se.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the necessarily included offense of attempted manslaughter by act amounted to fundamental error because that offense is one step removed from the convicted offense of attempted second degree murder.”

Establishes the core legal error found by the court.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant Cornell Roberts was charged with attempted first-degree murder and subsequently convicted of the lesser included offense of attempted second…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CORNELL ROBERTS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3877

[December 5, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; William W. Haury, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 16- 003909CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

CONCESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. Appellant was charged with attempted first degree murder. Following a jury trial, he was convicted of the lesser included offense of attempted second degree murder. As the state concedes, the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the necessarily included offense of attempted manslaughter by act amounted to fundamental error because that offense is one step removed from the convicted offense of attempted second degree murder. See Walton v. State, 208 So. 3d 60, 64 (Fla. 2016); Coleman v. State, 110 So. 3d 971, 972 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Nothing in the record suggests that appellant expressly waived the instruction. Defense counsel did not waive the error by failing to request an instruction on attempted manslaughter by act. See Roberts v. State, 242 So. 3d 296,299 (Fla. 2018). Reversed and remanded for a new trial. GERBER, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw