JACOBSEN
v.
BUSKO

Fla. 3d DCA | 2018-12-19
No. 18-1545
John Cornyn
262 So. 3d 238 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2018) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Only the court-appointed guardian, not the incapacitated ward, has the legal capacity to contract with an attorney to represent the ward.


Headnotes

[1] A ward's right to contract with an attorney is removed upon a court's order determining the ward is incapacitated.

[2] In a guardianship proceeding, only the ward's plenary guardian has the capacity to enter into a contract with an attorney on behalf of the ward.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Rights that may be removed from a person by an order determining incapacity and which may be delegated to the guardian include the right . . . [t]o contract”

Citing Fla. Stat. § 744.3215(3)(a) to explain that contracting rights are among those removed from an incapacitated person and vested in the guardian.

Facts & Procedural History

The trial court determined Karen Jacobsen was incapacitated and appointed Barbara Busko as her guardian. Thereafter, Jacobsen contacted attorney Jonat…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

SCALES, J.

Petitioner, attorney Jonathan N. David, seeks certiorari review of an order denying Mr. David’s motion seeking authorization to represent Karen Jacobsen,1 the ward in this guardianship proceeding. We deny Mr. David’s petition.

The trial court determined the ward was incapacitated and appointed a guardian to represent the ward’s interests. Thereafter, the record reflects that the ward reached out directly to Mr. David to hire him as the ward’s attorney. While section 744.3215(1)(l) of the Florida Statutes (2018) does give the ward a right to counsel, the ward’s right to contract with Mr. David was removed by the trial court’s prior order determining the ward was incapacitated. See In re Guardianship of Bockmuller, 602 So. 2d 608, 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Only the ward’s plenary guardian, respondent Barbara Busko, has the capacity to enter into a contract with an attorney on behalf of the ward. Id. (citing section 744.3215(3)(a), which provides that “[r]ights that may be removed from a person by an order determining incapacity and which may be delegated to the guardian include the right . . . [t]o contract”). Ms. Busko has hired counsel other than Mr. David to represent the ward.

Accordingly, we deny the petition.2 1 Mr. David designated the ward as “co-petitioner” in the petition.

Footnotes
2 We also deny the guardian’s request for attorney’s fees.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw