GRIFFIN
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Although a trial court may orally pronounce probation violations, a formal written order specifying each condition violated must be entered in the record.
[1] Although a trial court may orally pronounce probation violations, a formal written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered for the record to…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Even though the record is clear, a formal, written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered in this case.”
Court citing Robinson v. State, 74 So. 3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
Charles Thomas Griffin appealed his probation revocation and resulting sentence on twelve issues.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Negligent Hiring cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
CHARLES THOMAS GRIFFIN,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D17-3427
[December 19, 2018]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elizabeth Anne Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 94- 11602CF10A.
Charles Thomas Griffin, Bonifay, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM. Appellant Charles Griffin appeals his probation revocation and resulting sentence, raising twelve issues. We affirm the revocation and sentence and remand only for the entry of a written order specifying which conditions of the probation agreement were violated. As the State properly concedes, although the trial court orally pronounced the violations of probation, the record lacks a written order. See Robinson v. State, 74 So. 3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“Even though the record is clear, a formal, written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered in this case. Therefore, we remand for entry of an order in conformity with this opinion.”).
Affirmed and remanded with directions. WARNER, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.