PREFERRED INSURANCE CO.

v.

ALBERT

Citator

Cited By

• Lopez v. State, 638 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 1994)
  …v. Pierce, 269 So. 2d 664 (Fla.1972). However, the question of whether there may be a cross-appeal requires an analysis of a number of decisions. The earliest case of pertinence was State v. McInnes, 133 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), cert. denied, 139 So. 2d 692 (Fla.1962), in which the State had appealed an order quashing two counts of a four-count information. The defendant cross-appealed that portion of the order denying his motion to quash the remaining counts. The State moved to dismiss the cross-appea…
• State v. McADAMS, 559 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
  …thority, once its jurisdiction is invoked, in the interest of justice “to grant any relief to which any party is entitled,” (emphasis added).2 This is consistent with the decision in State v. McInnes, 133 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), cert. denied 139 So. 2d 692 (Fla.1962) which permitted the defendant to cross-appeal, although a direct appeal would have been precluded by the rules, because the court found “nothing in the rules which specifically prohibits a defendant from taking a cross-appeal in those ins…
• State v. McINNES, 147 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 1962)

Authorities Cited

• Harrington v. City OF Miami, 133 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)