DAVID L. WILSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The sentencing enhancement provided in Fla. Stat. § 775.087(2)(b) was properly applied.
[1] Fla. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDavid L. Wilson appealed a circuit court judgment in Pinellas County. The specific factual details regarding the underlying offense and conviction are…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Michael F. Andrews, Judge.
David L. Wilson, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 775.087(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006); State v. Whitehead, 472 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1985); Martinez v. State, 114 So. 3d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013);
Sheppard v. State, 113 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Robinson v. State, 37 So. 3d 921 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Burttram v. State, 846 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Burttram v. State, 846 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Sheppard v. State, 113 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
- Martinez v. State, 114 So. 3d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)