OLLN SHAW, PETITIONER,
v.
H. G. COCHRAN, JR., DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1962-04-25
No. 31464
ROBERTS, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
140 So. 2d 302 Florida Supreme Court (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the return of the respondent to the writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued, it has been determined by this Court that the writ should be discharged and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the respondent.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Marilee Smith and S. C. Smith v. City OF Arcadia, 185 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
    …issued for the nonpayment of ad valorem taxes assessed by a municipal corporation. See § 167.46, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.” This last cited case was the subject of a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida which petition was denied (140 So. 2d 302). Appellee strongly relies upon the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in the case of Ideal Farms Drainage District v. Certain Lands, 1944, 154 Fla. 554, 19 So. 2d 234. This decision is based upon Section 95.02 of the Florida Statutes, F.S.A. w…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw