MICHAEL ERIC PIERCE
v.
ERIN MARIE PIERCE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must make specific factual determinations and findings supporting its calculation of child support and arrears rather than simply awarding an amount without documented reasoning.
[1] A trial court must make explicit factual findings supporting the calculation of child support obligations and arrears rather than issuing an award without documented reas…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMichael Eric Pierce appealed the trial court's Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage in Calhoun County. The trial court awarded child support and …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Child Support Arrearages cases and more on FLexlaw
January 25, 2019 PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Michael Eric Pierce, challenges the trial court’s Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. We reject his claims except his argument that the trial court failed to make the requisite factual determinations justifying the amount of child support awarded, as well as any arrears. Accordingly, we reverse and remand so that the trial court can make the appropriate factual findings relating to the trial court’s calculation of the child support and arrears owed by Pierce. See Exter v. Diodonet-Molina, 152 So. 3d 699, 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); Aguirre v. Aguirre, 985 So. 2d 1203, 1207 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Michael Eric Pierce, pro se, Appellant. Erin Marie Pierce, pro se, Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Aguirre v. Aguirre, 985 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
- Van Exter v. Diodonet-Molina, 152 So. 3d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)