DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.
v.
JACOB KRAWIEC KAYELA KRAWIEC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Following remand from the Florida Supreme Court, the trial court's dismissal of a deficiency claim must be reversed and the case remanded for determination on the merits.
[1] When the Florida Supreme Court quashes a lower appellate court's decision and remands with instructions to reconsider in light of intervening controlling precedent, the a…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDyck-O'Neal, Inc. appealed a dismissal order entered by the Duval County Circuit Court regarding a deficiency claim. The case was remanded to the Firs…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The Florida Supreme Court has quashed the decision in this case and remanded with instructions that we reconsider the matter in light of its decision in Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S278 (Fla. July 5, 2018). In compliance with the Florida Supreme Court's directive, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal order and remand this case for determination on the merits of Dyck-O’Neal’s deficiency claim.
REVERSED and REMANDED. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and MAKAR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Susan B. Morrison, of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., and David M. Snyder, of David M. Snyder, and Joshua D. Moore, of Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant. Adam B. Schemer, Jacksonville, for Appellee.