ROBERT VIDAL
v.
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A debtor's appeal must be dismissed when the appellant fails to preserve errors, provide an adequate appellate record, and demonstrate reversible error.
[1] An appellant's failure to preserve errors, provide an adequate appellate record, and demonstrate reversible error is grounds for affirming the trial court's judgment with…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
Court citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee to explain why an adequate record is necessary for appellate review
Robert Vidal, a debtor, appealed a county court's final judgment and order denying his motion for new trial in a case against Barclays Bank Delaware.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For New Trial cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
ROBERT VIDAL, Appellant,
v.
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1099
[April 22, 2026]
Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Edmond Warren Alonzo III, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562024CC000678AXXXHC.
Robert Vidal, Port St. Lucie, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the county court's final judgment and order denying the debtor's motion for new trial. The debtor failed to preserve the asserted errors, failed to provide an adequate record for review, and failed to demonstrate reversible error. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).
Affirmed.
KLINGENSMITH, SHAW and LOTT, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Carraway v. Armour & Co. & the Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 156 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 1963)