AUGUST ROSE ISAACS
v.
PELAGIC POOLS, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court cannot reverse a trial court judgment when the appellant fails to provide a record of the trial proceedings necessary to review factual or legal issues.
[1] An appellant's failure to provide a complete record of trial proceedings precludes appellate review of the factual sufficiency of the judgment or claims of legal error by…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
Court explaining the requirement for a complete trial record to support appellate review
August Rose Isaacs appealed a judgment from the County Court for Polk County in a case against Pelagic Pools, Inc. The appellant proceeded pro se.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2025-1920 Lower Tribunal No. 2024-SC-011621
AUGUST ROSE ISAACS, Appellant,
v.
PELAGIC POOLS, INC., Appellee.
Appeal from the County Court for Polk County. David E. Stamey, Jr., Judge.
May 8, 2026
PER CURIAM
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.").
NARDELLA, SMITH and MIZE, JJ., concur.
August Rose Isaacs, Winter Haven, pro se.
Stephen Senn, of Peterson & Myers, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
2