FELIX
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment is affirmed.
[1] An appellate court may warn a pro se litigant that future filings determined to be frivolous may result in sanctions, including prohibition against further pro se filings…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceYvens Felix appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Felix was proceeding pro se.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sanctions For Frivolous Appeals cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2025-2119
YVENS FELIX, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge.
May 12, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. The Court warns Appellant that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court.
ROWE, RAY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.