CETKOVIC
v.
CETKOVIC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A final judgment of dissolution containing a scrivener's error imputing income based on the wrong state's minimum wage must be remanded for correction.
[1] When a record on appeal lacks a transcript of the hearing, an appellate court may address only errors apparent on the face of the record.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChristina Cetkovic appealed a final judgment dissolving her marriage to Nikolas Cetkovic. The judgment imputed income to the Husband based on New Jers…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review Without Transcript cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
CHRISTINA CETKOVIC, Appellant,
V.
NIKOLAS CETKOVIC, Appellee.
No. 2D2024-2752
May 15, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County; Don T. Hall, Judge.
Shelli Freeland Eddie of The Freeland Eddie Law Group, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellant.
Destiney R. Smith of the Law Office of Destiney R. Smith, Fort Myers, for Appellee.
SLEET, Judge.
Christina Cetkovic, the Wife, appeals from the final judgment of dissolution of her marriage to Nikolas Cetkovic, the Husband. Because our record does not include a transcript of the final dissolution hearing, we can only address error that is apparent on the face of the record. See Smith v. Smith, 39 So. 3d 458, 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). The Wife argues and the Husband concedes that the final judgment contains a scrivener's
error in that it imputes income to the Husband in an amount of the minimum wage for the State of New Jersey when the Husband in fact lives in the State of New York. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to correct this scrivener's error. We otherwise affirm the final judgment without further comment.
Affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener's error.
LaROSE and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
2