DUSTIN ANDREW BISHOP
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed based on controlling precedent in Guzman v. State.
Dustin Andrew Bishop was convicted in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County, and appealed the judgment.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
DUSTIN ANDREW BISHOP, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2024-2202
[May 20, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Michael Carlton Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562022CF003365AXXXXX.
Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Logan Tanner Mohs, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Gail Koenig, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72, 73 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022), rev. denied, No. SC2022-1597, 2023 WL 3830251 (Fla. June 6, 2023), cert. denied, U.S. ----, 144 S. Ct. 2595, 219 L.Ed.2d 1247 (2024).
GROSS, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.