ATIIM MALCOLM
v.
TAMEIKA FARRELL-JONES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A final judgment of dissolution of marriage is affirmed, with the former husband permitted to petition for modification based on material changes in circumstances regarding monthly overtime hours.
[1] A former spouse may petition for modification of a dissolution judgment based on a material change of circumstances, such as a substantial change in income or overtime ho…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“did not abuse its discretion in finding that the former husband's decrease in income was a substantial change of circumstances warranting a reduction of his child support obligation”
Citation to deLabry v. Sales regarding material changes in circumstances
Atiim Malcolm appealed a final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered by the trial court in a Broward County family law case.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Child Support Modification cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
ATIIM MALCOLM, Appellant,
V.
TAMEIKA FARRELL-JONES, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2012
[May 20, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Catalina Avalos, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062023DR009430AXXXCE.
Atiim Malcolm, Miami, pro se.
Tameika Farrell-Jones, Lauderhill, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage without prejudice for the former husband to petition for a modification based on a material change of circumstances regarding his monthly overtime hours. See deLabry v. Sales, 134 So. 3d 1110, 1116 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding that based upon section 61.13(1)(a)2., Florida Statutes, the trial court “did not abuse its discretion in finding that the former husband's decrease in income was a substantial change of circumstances warranting a reduction of his child support obligation").
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.