CABEZUDO
v.
CABEZUDO
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A court may restrict a pro se litigant from filing future pleadings without attorney representation when the litigant has engaged in a pattern of filing numerous duplicative or unauthorized documents.
[1] A court may restrict a pro se litigant from filing future pleadings without representation by a licensed attorney when the litigant has engaged in a pattern of filing num…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner Geraldine Cabezudo initiated six proceedings and filed over 200 documents that were largely duplicative or unauthorized. The court issued a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Writ Of Prohibition cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
GERALDINE CABEZUDO, Petitioner,
V.
ANDREW CABEZUDO, Respondent. No. 2D2025-3302
May 29, 2026
Petition for Writ of Prohibition to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Jack Helinger, Judge.
Geraldine Cabezudo, pro se.
No appearance for Respondent.
ORDER RESTRICTING PETITIONER FROM FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS
PER CURIAM.
On January 12, 2026, this court issued an order to show cause detailing Petitioner's initiation of six proceedings and filing of over 200 documents that were largely duplicative or unauthorized. The order directed Petitioner to show cause why this court should not direct the clerk of this court to reject any pleadings from Petitioner unless the filing
is related to a pending case or submitted by a licensed Florida attorney. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48-49 (Fla. 1999).
Petitioner did not file a timely response to our order. Accordingly, we direct the clerk of this court to place in an inactive file any pro se notices of appeal or petitions filed by Petitioner related to lower tribunal cases 25-2342-FD-12 and 522025CA005862XXCICI unless the filing is signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See id.
KELLY, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication. 2