RICHARD CLAYMAN
v.
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Fla. 4th DCA | 2026-06-04
No. 2025-0740
Collins, J., Klingensmith, J., Shepherd, J., Lott, J.
2026 FL 6762 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment in favor of the insurance company was affirmed.


Facts & Procedural History

Richard Clayman appealed a judgment entered against him in a case involving Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company. The case originated in …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD CLAYMAN, Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D2025-0740

[June 4, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Sherri Lyn Collins, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502023CC011679XXXAMB.

Chad Andrew Barr and Dalton L. Gray of Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for appellant.

David Andrew Noel and Kara Rockenbach Link of Link & Rockenbach, PA, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, SHEPHERD and LOTT, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw