KWIEAR DAVIS
v.
SHATARA OLIVER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court cannot reverse a trial court's judgment when the appellant fails to provide a record of the trial proceedings.
[1] An appellate court cannot reverse a trial court's judgment on the basis that it is unsupported by evidence or that the trial court misapplied the law when the appellant f…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
Court explaining why reversal is improper without a trial record
Kwiear Davis appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. The appellant proceeded pro se and di…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
KWIEAR DAVIS, Appellant,
v.
SHATARA OLIVER, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2225
[June 10, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John M. Alexander, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 502025DR002228XXXANB.
Kwiear Davis, West Palm Beach, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).
CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.