JOHN A. VIESTA
v.
ALEX M. VIESTA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in favor of the appellee was affirmed.
This case involves a dispute between John A. Viesta and Alex M. Viesta. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed in this per curiam opinion.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
JOHN A. VIESTA, Appellant,
V.
ALEX M. VIESTA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1768
[June 18, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Nancy Alley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312023CA001148XXXXXX.
Samuel Robert Alexander and Michael Joseph Ellis of Alexander Appellate Law, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.
Brook Eben Miscoski and Adam Fetterman of Fetterman Law, PLLC, Palm City, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.