GERALD RAY HOFFMAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2026-06-19
No. 2025-2803
McCourt, J., Jay, C.J., Makar, J., Kilbane, J.
2026 FL 7612 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Erlinger does not apply retroactively to cases that have become final, and arguments related to Apprendi are not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a).


Headnotes

[1] Erlinger v. …

[2] Arguments based on Apprendi v. …

Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Gerald Ray Hoffman, an inmate at Raiford, filed a Rule 3.800(a) motion in Marion County Circuit Court challenging his conviction on grounds related to…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 5D2025-2803 LT Case No. 42-2006-CF-1659-A

GERALD RAY HOFFMAN, Appellant,

V.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Timothy Thomas McCourt, Judge.

Gerald Ray Hoffman, Raiford, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Samuel Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

June 19, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Maye v. State, 51 Fla. L. Weekly S116, No. SC2023-1184, 2026 WL 1346031, at *4 (Fla. May 14, 2026) (noting that Erlinger[1] does not apply retroactively to cases that have become final and that arguments related to Apprendi[2] are not cognizable under rule 3.800(a)); see also Galindez v. State, 955 So. 2d 517, 522 (Fla. 2007) (holding that the harmless error analysis to be applied to an Apprendi violation is whether the record demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found the fact absent the error).

JAY, C.J., and MAKAR and KILBANE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw