VICTOR DAMODRICK PROSPER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed based on the controlling precedent established in Guzman v. State.
Victor Damodrick Prosper appealed a judgment entered by the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Per Curiam Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
VICTOR DAMODRICK PROSPER, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0597
[June 24, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest Albert Kollra, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 062024CF002775A88810.
Daniel Eisenberg, Public Defender, and Siobhan Helene Shea, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Ignacio Tapia, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).
KLINGENSMITH, SHEPHERD and LOTT, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.