OLSON PIERRE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A claim of juror concealment raised in a Rule 3.850 motion is subject to timeliness requirements and may be rejected when untimely.
[1] A claim of juror concealment raised in a Rule 3.850 motion is subject to timeliness requirements under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(1).
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOlson Pierre appealed from a circuit court decision in Miami-Dade County dismissing his Rule 3.850 motion. The motion alleged juror concealment as gro…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed June 25, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-2562
Lower Tribunal No. F04-33909B
Olson Pierre,
Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge.
Bross & Savy, PLLC, and Bryan D. Savy (West Melbourne), for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ryan P. Schelwat, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LINDSEY and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(1); Rivera v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D2606 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 10, 2025) (rejecting similar untimely claim of juror concealment).
2